Good systems are good for business.

 

They save time, reduce repetition, and cut the kind of low-value digital activity that quietly consumes energy without producing much. That connection between efficient operations and environmental responsibility isn't incidental. It's one of the reasons I build the way I do.

​

I use AI tools in my work, and I want to be straightforward about that. These tools have a real energy footprint. A single AI query uses roughly ten times the electricity of a standard search. I'm aware of that, and it shapes how I use them: purposefully, not prolifically. The goal is always to reduce the time spent on tasks that don't require human thinking, so that human attention goes where it actually matters.

​

I run a small, largely digital consultancy. No office, limited travel, most client meetings held remotely. My footprint is modest by most measures, though I'm under no illusion that modest means none. I'm currently reviewing the energy sourcing of the platforms I rely on, and I encourage the businesses I work with to do the same.

​

For Australian businesses, the practical starting points are straightforward: switch to a green energy provider, default to virtual meetings where possible, measure your baseline using tools like Trace Australia or the SME Climate Hub, and offset what you can't yet eliminate through programs like Climate Active. None of it requires a complete overhaul. Small, consistent changes across a lot of businesses genuinely add up.

​

I don't think sustainability pages should read like performance. This one is an honest account of where I'm at, what I'm doing, and what I'm still working on. I'd rather say that clearly than gesture at values I haven't fully earned yet.

 

Want to go deeper on the connection between systems, AI, and environmental impact? Read the full article.